GeForce 9800M GT SLI vs GTX 560 Ti 448

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
560 OEM 560 Ti 448 570 570 Rev. 2 580 580 Rev. 2 590
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9800M GT 9800M GTS 9800M GT SLI 9800M GTS SLI 9800M GTX 9800M GTX SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 with GeForce 9800M GT SLI, including specs and performance data.

GTX 560 Ti 448
2011
1280 MB GDDR5, 210 Watt
7.18
+306%

560 Ti 448 outperforms 9800M SLI by a whopping 306% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 560 Ti 448 GTX 560 Ti 448
9800M GT SLI 9800M GT SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking568944
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.41no data
Power efficiency2.761.10
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code nameGF110NB9E-GT2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 November 2011 (13 years ago)15 July 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$289 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448192
Core clock speed732 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million1508 Million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate40.99no data
Floating-point processing power1.312 TFLOPSno data
ROPs40no data
TMUs56no data
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache640 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1280 MB512 MB
Memory bus width320 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth152.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMIno data
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.0+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 53 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.18 1.77
Recency 29 November 2011 15 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1280 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 130 Watt

GTX 560 Ti 448 has a 305.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

9800M GT SLI, on the other hand, has 61.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GT SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 9800M GT SLI is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT SLI
GeForce 9800M GT SLI
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 560 Ti 448 GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
GTX 470 GeForce GTX 470
9800M GT SLI GeForce 9800M GT SLI
vs
HD 6850M Radeon HD 6850M
GTX 560 Ti 448 GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
R7 360 Radeon R7 360
GT 610 PCI NVIDIA GT 610 PCI
vs
ATI WinBoost
GT 610 PCI NVIDIA GT 610 PCI
vs
GTX 750 Ti OEM 750 Ti OEM
GT 610 PCI NVIDIA GT 610 PCI
vs
RX 7900 XTX 7900 XTX
GT 610 PCIe x1 NVIDIA GT 610 PCIe x1
vs
Arc A770 A770
GTX 560 OEM NVIDIA GTX 560 OEM
vs
9600 GT Rev. 2 9600 GT Rev. 2
GTX 560 Ti 448 NVIDIA GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
GTS 150 OEM 150 OEM
GTX 560 Ti 448 NVIDIA GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
9600 GT Rev. 2 9600 GT Rev. 2
510 OEM GeForce 510 OEM
vs
ATI HD 3830 3830
510 OEM GeForce 510 OEM
vs
GTX 750 Ti OEM 750 Ti OEM
GTX 460 v2 NVIDIA GTX 460 v2
vs
NVS 295 295

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 29 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9800M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 or GeForce 9800M GT SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.