GeForce GT 545 vs GTX 560 SE
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 560 SE and GeForce GT 545, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
560 SE outperforms GT 545 by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 699 | 843 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.13 | 0.34 |
| Power efficiency | 2.26 | 2.91 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | GF114 | GF116 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 20 February 2012 (13 years ago) | 14 May 2011 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $89.99 | $149 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
GT 545 has 162% better value for money than GTX 560 SE.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 288 | 144 |
| Core clock speed | 736 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,950 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 35.33 | 17.28 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.8479 TFLOPS | 0.4147 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 24 | 16 |
| TMUs | 48 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 384 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 210 mm | 145 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 957 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 91.87 GB/s | 38.4 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDMI | + | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.18 | 2.52 |
| Recency | 20 February 2012 | 14 May 2011 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 70 Watt |
GTX 560 SE has a 65.9% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 9 months.
GT 545, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 114.3% lower power consumption.
The GeForce GTX 560 SE is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 545 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
