Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 550 Ti with Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), including specs and performance data.

GTX 550 Ti
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 116 Watt
4.03
+106%

GTX 550 Ti outperforms R7 (Bristol Ridge) by a whopping 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking695901
Place by popularity81not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.79no data
Power efficiency2.382.99
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 1.2 (2016)
GPU code nameGF116Bristol Ridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 March 2011 (13 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192512
Core clock speed900 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data900 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million2410 Million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)116 Watt12-45 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature100 °Cno data
Texture fill rate28.80no data
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length210 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed4.1 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth98.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMIno data
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.2no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 550 Ti 4.03
+106%
R7 (Bristol Ridge) 1.96

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 550 Ti 1554
+106%
R7 (Bristol Ridge) 754

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 550 Ti 2272
+22.7%
R7 (Bristol Ridge) 1852

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 550 Ti 10229
+83.7%
R7 (Bristol Ridge) 5568

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p38
+111%
18−20
−111%
Full HD38
+192%
13
−192%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.92no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Hitman 3 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+58.8%
16−18
−58.8%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Hitman 3 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+58.8%
16−18
−58.8%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+6.7%
15
−6.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Hitman 3 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+58.8%
16−18
−58.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Hitman 3 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+127%
10−12
−127%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hitman 3 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

This is how GTX 550 Ti and R7 (Bristol Ridge) compete in popular games:

  • GTX 550 Ti is 111% faster in 900p
  • GTX 550 Ti is 192% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 550 Ti is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 550 Ti surpassed R7 (Bristol Ridge) in all 53 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.03 1.96
Recency 15 March 2011 1 June 2016
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 116 Watt 12 Watt

GTX 550 Ti has a 105.6% higher aggregate performance score.

R7 (Bristol Ridge), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 866.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 550 Ti is a desktop card while Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 59476 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 550 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 42 votes

Rate Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.