NVS 5100M vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 550 Ti with NVS 5100M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 550 Ti
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 116 Watt
3.95
+675%

GTX 550 Ti outperforms NVS 5100M by a whopping 675% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7031240
Place by popularity76not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.78no data
Power efficiency2.391.02
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGF116GT216
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date15 March 2011 (13 years ago)7 January 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19248
Core clock speed900 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)116 Watt35 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature100 °Cno data
Texture fill rate28.808.800
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS0.1162 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs3216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length210 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4.1 GB/s800 MHz
Memory bandwidth98.4 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.23.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 550 Ti 3.95
+675%
NVS 5100M 0.51

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 550 Ti 1554
+681%
NVS 5100M 199

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p38
+850%
4−5
−850%
Full HD37
+825%
4−5
−825%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.03no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Fortnite 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Valorant 50−55
+783%
6−7
−783%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
+750%
8−9
−750%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Dota 2 30−35
+750%
4−5
−750%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Fortnite 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Metro Exodus 7−8 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Valorant 50−55
+783%
6−7
−783%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Dota 2 30−35
+750%
4−5
−750%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Valorant 50−55
+783%
6−7
−783%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%
Valorant 40−45
+700%
5−6
−700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Valorant 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5 0−1

This is how GTX 550 Ti and NVS 5100M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 550 Ti is 850% faster in 900p
  • GTX 550 Ti is 825% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.95 0.51
Recency 15 March 2011 7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 116 Watt 35 Watt

GTX 550 Ti has a 674.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

NVS 5100M, on the other hand, has 231.4% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 5100M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 550 Ti is a desktop card while NVS 5100M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
NVIDIA NVS 5100M
NVS 5100M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 59589 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 550 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 36 votes

Rate NVS 5100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 550 Ti or NVS 5100M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.