HD Graphics 2500 vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 550 Ti with HD Graphics 2500, including specs and performance data.

GTX 550 Ti
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 116 Watt
4.02
+491%

GTX 550 Ti outperforms HD Graphics 2500 by a whopping 491% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking6541138
Place by popularity71not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.29no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Gen. 7 Ivy Bridge (2011−2012)
GPU code nameGF116Ivy Bridge GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 March 2011 (13 years ago)1 April 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data
Current price$197 (1.3x MSRP)$521

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 550 Ti and HD Graphics 2500 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1926
CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed900 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1150 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)116 Wattunknown
Maximum GPU temperature100 °Cno data
Texture fill rate28.8 billion/sec6.900
Floating-point performance691.2 gflops13.8 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 550 Ti and HD Graphics 2500 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length8.25" (21 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsOne 6-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed4.1 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth98.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.24.0
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.80
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 550 Ti 4.02
+491%
HD Graphics 2500 0.68

GeForce GTX 550 Ti outperforms HD Graphics 2500 by 491% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 550 Ti 2272
+548%
HD Graphics 2500 351

GeForce GTX 550 Ti outperforms HD Graphics 2500 by 548% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 550 Ti 10229
+430%
HD Graphics 2500 1931

GeForce GTX 550 Ti outperforms HD Graphics 2500 by 430% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p38
+533%
6−7
−533%
Full HD32
+357%
7
−357%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+456%
9−10
−456%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+463%
8−9
−463%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+456%
18−20
−456%
Hitman 3 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+483%
12−14
−483%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+450%
10−11
−450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+450%
10−11
−450%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+456%
9−10
−456%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+463%
8−9
−463%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+456%
18−20
−456%
Hitman 3 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+483%
12−14
−483%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+450%
10−11
−450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+450%
10−11
−450%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+463%
8−9
−463%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+456%
18−20
−456%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+483%
12−14
−483%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+450%
10−11
−450%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+450%
10−11
−450%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+483%
6−7
−483%
Hitman 3 35−40
+483%
6−7
−483%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%

This is how GTX 550 Ti and HD Graphics 2500 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 550 Ti is 533% faster in 900p
  • GTX 550 Ti is 357% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.02 0.68
Recency 15 March 2011 1 April 2012
Chip lithography 40 nm 22 nm

The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2500 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 550 Ti is a desktop card while HD Graphics 2500 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Intel HD Graphics 2500
HD Graphics 2500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 59187 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 550 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1182 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.