GeForce 910M vs GTX 550 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 550 Ti with GeForce 910M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 550 Ti
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 116 Watt
4.02
+164%

GTX 550 Ti outperforms 910M by a whopping 164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking703981
Place by popularity76not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.79no data
Power efficiency2.393.18
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameGF116GK208B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 March 2011 (13 years ago)13 March 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192384
Core clock speed900 MHz641 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)116 Watt33 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature100 °Cno data
Texture fill rate28.8020.51
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS0.4923 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs3232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0PCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length210 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GBDDR3 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed4.1 GB/s1001 MHz
Memory bandwidth98.4 GB/s16.02 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boostno data2.0
Optimus-+
GameWorks-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.24.5
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 550 Ti 4.02
+164%
GeForce 910M 1.52

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 550 Ti 1554
+164%
GeForce 910M 589

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 550 Ti 2272
+60.8%
GeForce 910M 1413

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 550 Ti 10229
+137%
GeForce 910M 4325

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 550 Ti 5781
+120%
GeForce 910M 2629

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p38
+171%
14−16
−171%
Full HD37
+311%
9
−311%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.03no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Fortnite 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Valorant 50−55
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
+127%
30
−127%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Dota 2 30−35
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Fortnite 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Valorant 50−55
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Dota 2 30−35
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Valorant 50−55
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+222%
9−10
−222%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+211%
9−10
−211%
Valorant 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Valorant 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how GTX 550 Ti and GeForce 910M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 550 Ti is 171% faster in 900p
  • GTX 550 Ti is 311% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 550 Ti is 1100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 550 Ti is ahead in 51 test (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.02 1.52
Recency 15 March 2011 13 March 2015
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 116 Watt 33 Watt

GTX 550 Ti has a 164.5% higher aggregate performance score.

GeForce 910M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 251.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 910M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 550 Ti is a desktop card while GeForce 910M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GeForce 910M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 59588 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 550 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 60 votes

Rate GeForce 910M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 550 Ti or GeForce 910M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.