Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce GTX 490

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated578
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data12.34
Power efficiencyno data6.63
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGF100Polaris 23
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)2 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480640
Core clock speed608 MHz1082 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)365 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate36.4834.62
Floating-point processing power1.166 TFLOPS1.385 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs6032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed854 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth164.0 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 365 Watt 65 Watt

Pro WX 3200 has a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 461.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 490 and Radeon Pro WX 3200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 490 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 490
GeForce GTX 490
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 30 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 490 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 83 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.