GeForce GTX 675M vs GTX 485M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 485M and GeForce GTX 675M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 485M
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
6.14
+22.6%

GTX 485M outperforms GTX 675M by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking586635
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.233.46
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF104GF114
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2011 (14 years ago)22 March 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed1150 MHz620 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate36.8039.68
Floating-point processing power0.8832 TFLOPS0.9523 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs6464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0PCI Express 2.0
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options++

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.0 GB/s96.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536Up to 2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 API
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 485M 6.14
+22.6%
GTX 675M 5.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 485M 2359
+22.4%
GTX 675M 1927

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 485M 2709
GTX 675M 3218
+18.8%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 485M 13536
GTX 675M 14756
+9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p48
+0%
48
+0%
Full HD63
+31.3%
48
−31.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Valorant 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Dota 2 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Fortnite 35−40
+24.1%
27−30
−24.1%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+18.6%
40−45
−18.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Valorant 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
World of Tanks 95−100
−5.2%
102
+5.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Dota 2 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+18.6%
40−45
−18.6%
Valorant 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+12.1%
30−35
−12.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
World of Tanks 40−45
+22.2%
35−40
−22.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Valorant 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Fortnite 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Valorant 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

This is how GTX 485M and GTX 675M compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 900p
  • GTX 485M is 31% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 485M is 100% faster.
  • in World of Tanks, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 675M is 5% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 485M is ahead in 56 tests (90%)
  • GTX 675M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (8%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.14 5.01
Recency 5 January 2011 22 March 2012

GTX 485M has a 22.6% higher aggregate performance score.

GTX 675M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The GeForce GTX 485M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 675M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
GeForce GTX 485M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
GeForce GTX 675M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 485M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 21 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 675M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.