FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 485M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 485M with FireStream 9270, including specs and performance data.

GTX 485M
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
5.64
+75.7%

485M outperforms FireStream 9270 by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking651798
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.341.54
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGF104RV770
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 January 2011 (15 years ago)13 November 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384800
Core clock speed1150 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate36.8030.00
Floating-point processing power0.8832 TFLOPS1.2 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs6440
L1 Cache512 KB160 KB
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.0 GB/s115.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 485M 5.64
+75.7%
FireStream 9270 3.21

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 485M 2359
+75.9%
Samples: 24
FireStream 9270 1341
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p48
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%
Full HD66
+88.6%
35−40
−88.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Fortnite 30−35
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Valorant 65−70
+91.4%
35−40
−91.4%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+92%
50−55
−92%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Dota 2 45−50
+95.8%
24−27
−95.8%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Fortnite 30−35
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Valorant 65−70
+91.4%
35−40
−91.4%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Dota 2 45−50
+95.8%
24−27
−95.8%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Valorant 65−70
+91.4%
35−40
−91.4%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 30−35
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+81%
21−24
−81%
Valorant 60−65
+80%
35−40
−80%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Valorant 27−30
+81.3%
16−18
−81.3%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

This is how GTX 485M and FireStream 9270 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 485M is 78% faster in 900p
  • GTX 485M is 89% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.64 3.21
Recency 5 January 2011 13 November 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 160 Watt

GTX 485M has a 76% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 38% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 485M is our recommended choice as it beats the FireStream 9270 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 485M is a notebook graphics card while FireStream 9270 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 485M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireStream 9270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 485M or FireStream 9270, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.