GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB vs GTX 485M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 485M SLI with GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB, including specs and performance data.

GTX 485M SLI
2011
2x2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
9.18

RTX 3080 12 GB outperforms GTX 485M SLI by a whopping 654% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking47725
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data40.98
Power efficiency6.2913.55
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameN11E-GTX-A1GA102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2011 (13 years ago)11 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7688960
Core clock speed575 MHz1260 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1710 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rateno data478.8
Floating-point processing powerno data30.64 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data285 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount2x2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1188 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data912.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 485M SLI 9.18
RTX 3080 12 GB 69.20
+654%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 485M SLI 5334
RTX 3080 12 GB 217116
+3970%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 485M SLI 24830
RTX 3080 12 GB 44533
+79.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p89
−630%
650−700
+630%
Full HD101
−84.2%
186
+84.2%
1440p14−16
−750%
119
+750%
4K10−12
−720%
82
+720%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.30
1440pno data6.71
4Kno data9.74

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−857%
130−140
+857%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−545%
140−150
+545%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−854%
120−130
+854%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−689%
220−230
+689%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−526%
110−120
+526%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−857%
130−140
+857%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−457%
110−120
+457%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−550%
160−170
+550%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−289%
230−240
+289%
Hitman 3 18−20
−617%
120−130
+617%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−394%
250−260
+394%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−434%
150−160
+434%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−365%
120−130
+365%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−867%
290−300
+867%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−149%
150−160
+149%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−545%
140−150
+545%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−854%
120−130
+854%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−689%
220−230
+689%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−526%
110−120
+526%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−857%
130−140
+857%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−457%
110−120
+457%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−550%
160−170
+550%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−289%
230−240
+289%
Hitman 3 18−20
−617%
120−130
+617%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−394%
250−260
+394%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−434%
150−160
+434%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−365%
120−130
+365%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−1087%
356
+1087%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−492%
140−150
+492%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−149%
150−160
+149%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−545%
140−150
+545%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−854%
120−130
+854%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−526%
110−120
+526%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−857%
130−140
+857%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−457%
110−120
+457%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−289%
230−240
+289%
Hitman 3 18−20
−617%
120−130
+617%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−416%
263
+416%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−947%
314
+947%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−560%
165
+560%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−55.7%
95
+55.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−365%
120−130
+365%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−817%
160−170
+817%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−686%
110−120
+686%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−800%
80−85
+800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−1660%
85−90
+1660%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−800%
80−85
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1725%
70−75
+1725%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−636%
80−85
+636%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−595%
270−280
+595%
Hitman 3 12−14
−742%
100−110
+742%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−984%
206
+984%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−792%
116
+792%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−2045%
236
+2045%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1278%
120−130
+1278%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−305%
230−240
+305%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−660%
110−120
+660%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−988%
85−90
+988%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−1050%
65−70
+1050%
Hitman 3 5−6
−1460%
78
+1460%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−511%
220−230
+511%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−1457%
100−110
+1457%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2100%
132
+2100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1040%
55−60
+1040%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1250%
50−55
+1250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1175%
50−55
+1175%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3300%
30−35
+3300%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−982%
110−120
+982%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−2740%
142
+2740%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−1733%
55
+1733%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−722%
70−75
+722%

This is how GTX 485M SLI and RTX 3080 12 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 12 GB is 630% faster in 900p
  • RTX 3080 12 GB is 84% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3080 12 GB is 750% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3080 12 GB is 720% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3080 12 GB is 3300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3080 12 GB surpassed GTX 485M SLI in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.18 69.20
Recency 6 January 2011 11 January 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 350 Watt

GTX 485M SLI has 250% lower power consumption.

RTX 3080 12 GB, on the other hand, has a 653.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 485M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 485M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI
GeForce GTX 485M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB
GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 2 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 485M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 960 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.