GeForce 410M vs GTX 485M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 485M SLI and GeForce 410M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 485M SLI
2011
2x2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
9.22
+1297%

GTX 485M SLI outperforms 410M by a whopping 1297% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4701179
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.393.81
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameN11E-GTX-A1GF119
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2011 (13 years ago)5 January 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76848
Core clock speed575 MHz575 MHz
Number of transistorsno data292 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1104 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data73
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2x2 GBUp to 512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHzUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataDisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data+
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 485M SLI 9.22
+1297%
GeForce 410M 0.66

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 485M SLI 5334
+1185%
GeForce 410M 415

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 485M SLI 24830
+1192%
GeForce 410M 1923

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p89
+1383%
6−7
−1383%
Full HD98
+1125%
8
−1125%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 0−1
Battlefield 5 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+1425%
4−5
−1425%
Hitman 3 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+364%
10−12
−364%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+103%
30−33
−103%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 0−1
Battlefield 5 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+1425%
4−5
−1425%
Hitman 3 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+364%
10−12
−364%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+150%
10−11
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+103%
30−33
−103%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+1425%
4−5
−1425%
Hitman 3 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+364%
10−12
−364%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+150%
10−11
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+103%
30−33
−103%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1850%
2−3
−1850%
Hitman 3 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+2850%
2−3
−2850%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7 0−1
Hitman 3 5−6 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
Metro Exodus 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

This is how GTX 485M SLI and GeForce 410M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 485M SLI is 1383% faster in 900p
  • GTX 485M SLI is 1125% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 485M SLI is 2850% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 485M SLI surpassed GeForce 410M in all 35 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.22 0.66
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 12 Watt

GTX 485M SLI has a 1297% higher aggregate performance score.

GeForce 410M, on the other hand, has 733.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 410M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI
GeForce GTX 485M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce 410M
GeForce 410M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 2 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 485M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 264 votes

Rate GeForce 410M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.