FirePro M3900 vs GeForce GTX 480M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking635not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.58no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameN11E-GTX-A3Seymour
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date25 May 2010 (15 years ago)19 October 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704160
Core clock speed425 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Number of transistors6000 Million370 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rateno data6.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.24 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno datan/a
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Form factorno datachip-down

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Eyefinity-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1111.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 May 2010 19 October 2010
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 20 Watt

GTX 480M SLI has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

FirePro M3900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 480M SLI and FirePro M3900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 480M SLI is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M3900 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
GeForce GTX 480M SLI
AMD FirePro M3900
FirePro M3900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce GTX 480M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 13 votes

Rate FirePro M3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 480M SLI or FirePro M3900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.