Tesla V100 SXM2 vs GeForce GTX 480M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking634not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.59no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameN11E-GTX-A3GV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date25 May 2010 (15 years ago)21 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7045120
Core clock speed425 MHz1370 MHz
Number of transistors6000 Million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data438.4
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data320

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz1758 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data900.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112.0
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 May 2010 21 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 250 Watt

GTX 480M SLI has 150% lower power consumption.

Tesla V100 SXM2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 480M SLI and Tesla V100 SXM2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 480M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Tesla V100 SXM2 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
GeForce GTX 480M SLI
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2
Tesla V100 SXM2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce GTX 480M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 46 votes

Rate Tesla V100 SXM2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 480M SLI or Tesla V100 SXM2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.