Radeon 625 vs GeForce GTX 480M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 480M SLI and Radeon 625, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 480M SLI
2010
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
5.96
+132%

GTX 480M SLI outperforms 625 by a whopping 132% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking617840
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.543.90
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameN11E-GTX-A3Polaris 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date25 May 2010 (15 years ago)13 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704384
Core clock speed425 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1024 MHz
Number of transistors6000 Million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data24.58
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p61
+154%
24−27
−154%
Full HD69
+156%
27−30
−156%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Sons of the Forest 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Fortnite 35−40
+185%
12−14
−185%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+108%
12−14
−108%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%
Sons of the Forest 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Valorant 65−70
+60.5%
40−45
−60.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+102%
50−55
−102%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Dota 2 45−50
+88.5%
24−27
−88.5%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Fortnite 35−40
+185%
12−14
−185%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+108%
12−14
−108%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%
Sons of the Forest 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Valorant 65−70
+60.5%
40−45
−60.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Dota 2 45−50
+88.5%
24−27
−88.5%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+108%
12−14
−108%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%
Sons of the Forest 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Valorant 65−70
+60.5%
40−45
−60.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+185%
12−14
−185%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+147%
18−20
−147%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+62.5%
24−27
−62.5%
Valorant 65−70
+196%
21−24
−196%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Sons of the Forest 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Valorant 30−35
+138%
12−14
−138%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Sons of the Forest 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

This is how GTX 480M SLI and Radeon 625 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 480M SLI is 154% faster in 900p
  • GTX 480M SLI is 156% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Sons of the Forest, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the GTX 480M SLI is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 480M SLI surpassed Radeon 625 in all 56 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.96 2.57
Recency 25 May 2010 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 50 Watt

GTX 480M SLI has a 131.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Radeon 625, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 480M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 625 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
GeForce GTX 480M SLI
AMD Radeon 625
Radeon 625

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce GTX 480M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 149 votes

Rate Radeon 625 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 480M SLI or Radeon 625, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.