ATI Radeon 9200 PRO vs GeForce GTX 480

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4931602
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.43no data
Power efficiency3.00no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGF100RV280
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date26 March 2010 (16 years ago)1 May 2003 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480no data
Core clock speed700 MHz239 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt28 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate42.060.96
Floating-point processing power1.345 TFLOPSno data
ROPs484
TMUs604
L1 Cache960 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB128 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1848 MHz (3696 data rate)164 MHz
Memory bandwidth177.4 GB/s5.248 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.21.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 480 4078
+203800%
Samples: 1870
ATI 9200 PRO 2
Samples: 41

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 18−20 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Counter-Strike 2 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 no data
Far Cry 5 30−35 no data
Fortnite 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 5 30−33 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
Valorant 90−95 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Counter-Strike 2 50−55 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 no data
Dota 2 70−75 no data
Far Cry 5 30−35 no data
Fortnite 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 5 30−33 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 20−22 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 no data
Valorant 90−95 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 no data
Dota 2 70−75 no data
Far Cry 5 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 no data
Valorant 90−95 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14 no data
Metro Exodus 10−12 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55 no data
Valorant 100−110 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 21−24 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 5−6 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 no data
Valorant 50−55 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14 no data
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 10−11 no data
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 March 2010 1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 28 Watt

GTX 480 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 PRO, on the other hand, has 793% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 480 and Radeon 9200 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 252 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 8 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 480 or Radeon 9200 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.