FirePro M8900 vs GeForce GTX 480

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking493not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.43no data
Power efficiency3.00no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGF100Blackcomb
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date26 March 2010 (16 years ago)12 April 2011 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480960
Core clock speed700 MHz680 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million1,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate42.0632.64
Floating-point processing power1.345 TFLOPS1.306 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs6048
L1 Cache960 KB192 KB
L2 Cache768 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0n/a
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorno dataMXM-B
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1848 MHz (3696 data rate)900 MHz
Memory bandwidth177.4 GB/s115 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.24.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 March 2010 12 April 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 75 Watt

FirePro M8900 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 33% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 233% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 480 and FirePro M8900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 480 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro M8900 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 252 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 10 votes

Rate FirePro M8900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 480 or FirePro M8900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.