Quadro K2200M vs GeForce GTX 480

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 480
2010
1536 MB GDDR5, 295 Watt
10.60
+18.3%

GeForce GTX 480 outperforms Quadro K2200M by a moderate 18% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking399453
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.273.83
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameGF100GM107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date7 December 2010 (13 years ago)19 July 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data
Current price$15.99 (0x MSRP)$228

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

K2200M has 202% better value for money than GTX 480.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480640
CUDA cores480no data
Core clock speed700 MHz667 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt65 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate42 billion/sec26.68
Floating-point performance1,345.0 gflops853.8 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 480 and Quadro K2200M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)no data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors6-pin & 8-pinNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1848 MHz (3696 data rate)5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth177.4 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Display Portno data1.2
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12
Shader Model5.15
OpenGL4.24.5
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A+
CUDA+5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 480 10.60
+18.3%
K2200M 8.96

GeForce GTX 480 outperforms Quadro K2200M by 18% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 480 4102
+18.3%
K2200M 3468

GeForce GTX 480 outperforms Quadro K2200M by 18% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 480 13163
+22%
K2200M 10787

GeForce GTX 480 outperforms Quadro K2200M by 22% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Hitman 3 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Hitman 3 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Hitman 3 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Hitman 3 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.60 8.96
Recency 7 December 2010 19 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 65 Watt

The GeForce GTX 480 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2200M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 480 is a desktop card while Quadro K2200M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
GeForce GTX 480
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
Quadro K2200M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 195 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 20 votes

Rate Quadro K2200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.