GeForce Go 7400 vs GTX 480

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	399	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.27	no data
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	no data
GPU code name	GF100	G72M
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	7 December 2010 (13 years ago)	1 February 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	no data
Current price	$15.99 (0x MSRP)	$1000

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	480	7
CUDA cores	480	no data
Core clock speed	700 MHz	3 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	450 MHz
Number of transistors	3,100 million	112 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	295 Watt	no data
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	42 billion/sec	1.800
Floating-point performance	1,345.0 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 480 and GeForce Go 7400 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	16x PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	6-pin & 8-pin	no data
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1536 MB	128 MB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	64 / 32 Bit
Memory clock speed	1848 MHz (3696 data rate)	no data
Memory bandwidth	177.4 GB/s	7.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	5.1	3.0
OpenGL	4.2	2.1
OpenCL	1.1	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	7 December 2010	1 February 2006
Maximum RAM amount	1536 MB	128 MB
Chip lithography	40 nm	90 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---