FirePro W4170M vs GeForce GTX 480

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 480 with FirePro W4170M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 480
2010
1536 MB GDDR5, 250 Watt
10.66
+293%

GTX 480 outperforms W4170M by a whopping 293% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking433807
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.65no data
Power efficiency2.92no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGF100Opal
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date26 March 2010 (14 years ago)23 April 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480384
Core clock speed700 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data900 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate42.0621.60
Floating-point processing power1.345 TFLOPS0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs6024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1848 MHz (3696 data rate)1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth177.4 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMIPortable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.16.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.12.1 (1.2)
VulkanN/A1.2.170
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 480 10.66
+293%
W4170M 2.71

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 480 4106
+293%
W4170M 1045

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 480 5014
+117%
W4170M 2315

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 480 3650
+107%
W4170M 1766

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD80−85
+281%
21
−281%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.24no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 0−1
Battlefield 5 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+446%
12−14
−446%
Hitman 3 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+176%
21−24
−176%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+1600%
2−3
−1600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+71.1%
35−40
−71.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 0−1
Battlefield 5 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+446%
12−14
−446%
Hitman 3 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+176%
21−24
−176%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+1600%
2−3
−1600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+100%
14−16
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+71.1%
35−40
−71.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+446%
12−14
−446%
Hitman 3 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+176%
21−24
−176%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+100%
14−16
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+71.1%
35−40
−71.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+308%
12−14
−308%
Hitman 3 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+214%
7−8
−214%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+319%
16−18
−319%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Hitman 3 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+370%
10−11
−370%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

This is how GTX 480 and W4170M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 480 is 281% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 480 is 1600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 480 surpassed W4170M in all 57 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.66 2.71
Recency 26 March 2010 23 April 2015
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

GTX 480 has a 293.4% higher aggregate performance score.

W4170M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 480 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W4170M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 480 is a desktop card while FirePro W4170M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
GeForce GTX 480
AMD FirePro W4170M
FirePro W4170M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 211 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 24 votes

Rate FirePro W4170M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.