Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 480 512

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated292
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.22
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGF100GP104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release dateno data21 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121792
Core clock speed527 MHz1139 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1404 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)375 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate33.73157.2
Floating-point processing powerno data5.032 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs64112
L1 Cacheno data672 KB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length292 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2.8 GB/s1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth134.4 GB/s168.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI 1.3aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.06.1

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 375 Watt 75 Watt

P3200 Max-Q has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 and Quadro P3200 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 26 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 or Quadro P3200 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.