RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell vs GeForce GTX 470M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 470M SLI with RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

GTX 470M SLI
2010
5.78

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell outperforms 470M SLI by a whopping 1630% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6251
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.90
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameN11E-GTGB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 November 2010 (14 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores57614080
Core clock speed535 MHz1740 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2377 MHz
Number of transistorsno data92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,045.9
Floating-point processing powerno data66.94 TFLOPS
ROPsno data176
TMUsno data440
Tensor Coresno data440
Ray Tracing Coresno data110
L1 Cacheno data13.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amountno data48 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.34 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p66
−1567%
1100−1150
+1567%
Full HD79
−1609%
1350−1400
+1609%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
−1567%
500−550
+1567%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−1567%
200−210
+1567%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−1567%
200−210
+1567%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 24−27
−1438%
400−450
+1438%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
−1567%
500−550
+1567%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−1567%
200−210
+1567%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−1400%
300−310
+1400%
Fortnite 35−40
−1522%
600−650
+1522%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−1507%
450−500
+1507%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
−1567%
300−310
+1567%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−1567%
200−210
+1567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−1422%
350−400
+1422%
Valorant 70−75
−1614%
1200−1250
+1614%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 24−27
−1438%
400−450
+1438%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
−1567%
500−550
+1567%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
−1616%
1750−1800
+1616%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−1567%
200−210
+1567%
Dota 2 50−55
−1600%
850−900
+1600%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−1400%
300−310
+1400%
Fortnite 35−40
−1522%
600−650
+1522%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−1507%
450−500
+1507%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
−1567%
300−310
+1567%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−1491%
350−400
+1491%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−1567%
200−210
+1567%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−1567%
200−210
+1567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−1422%
350−400
+1422%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−1606%
290−300
+1606%
Valorant 70−75
−1614%
1200−1250
+1614%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
−1438%
400−450
+1438%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−1567%
200−210
+1567%
Dota 2 50−55
−1600%
850−900
+1600%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−1400%
300−310
+1400%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−1507%
450−500
+1507%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−1567%
200−210
+1567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−1422%
350−400
+1422%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−1606%
290−300
+1606%
Valorant 70−75
−1614%
1200−1250
+1614%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
−1522%
600−650
+1522%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1567%
200−210
+1567%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
−1567%
800−850
+1567%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−1611%
650−700
+1611%
Valorant 65−70
−1567%
1150−1200
+1567%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
−1600%
170−180
+1600%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−1567%
200−210
+1567%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1567%
250−260
+1567%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−1525%
130−140
+1525%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
−1567%
200−210
+1567%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−1567%
300−310
+1567%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
Valorant 30−35
−1513%
500−550
+1513%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Dota 2 21−24
−1491%
350−400
+1491%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−1567%
150−160
+1567%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%

This is how GTX 470M SLI and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is 1567% faster in 900p
  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is 1609% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.78 100.00
Recency 1 November 2010 18 March 2025
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has a 1630.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 470M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 470M SLI is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI
GeForce GTX 470M SLI
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 470M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 248 votes

Rate RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 470M SLI or RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.