GeForce G103M vs GTX 470

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking515not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.28no data
Power efficiency2.61no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGF100G98
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date26 March 2010 (14 years ago)1 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4488
Core clock speed607 MHz640 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)215 Watt14 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate34.055.120
Floating-point processing power1.089 TFLOPS0.0256 TFLOPS
ROPs404
TMUs568

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1280 MB512 MB
Memory bus width320 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1674 MHz (3348 data rate)500 MHz
Memory bandwidth133.9 GB/s8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIMini HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.23.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 March 2010 1 September 2009
Maximum RAM amount 1280 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 215 Watt 14 Watt

GTX 470 has an age advantage of 6 months, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce G103M, on the other hand, has 1435.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 470 and GeForce G103M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 470 is a desktop card while GeForce G103M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
GeForce GTX 470
NVIDIA GeForce G103M
GeForce G103M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 317 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 32 votes

Rate GeForce G103M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.