Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs GeForce GTX 465

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking625not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.08no data
Power efficiency2.44no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGF100Ellesmere
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date31 May 2010 (15 years ago)24 April 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3522304 ×2
Core clock speed607 MHz1243 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt250 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate26.75179.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.8554 TFLOPS5.728 TFLOPS ×2
Compute performance30xno data
ROPs3232 ×2
TMUs44144 ×2
L1 Cache704 KB576 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm305 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1603 MHz (3206 data rate)1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.6 GB/s224.0 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIMini HDMI1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2010 24 April 2017
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 250 Watt

GTX 465 has 25% lower power consumption.

Pro Duo Polaris, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 465 and Radeon Pro Duo Polaris. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 465 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro Duo Polaris is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 126 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 35 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Duo Polaris on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 465 or Radeon Pro Duo Polaris, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.