Radeon HD 7470M vs GeForce GTX 465

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
460 460 768MB 460 OEM 460 SE 460 SE v2 460 v2 460 v2 ES 460 X2 465
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6430M 6450M 6470M 6490M 6490M Mac Edition 7410M 7430M 7450M 7470M 7490M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 465 with Radeon HD 7470M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 465
2010, $279
1 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
6.35
+555%

GTX 465 outperforms HD 7470M by a whopping 555% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 465 GTX 465
HD 7470M HD 7470M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6201160
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.08no data
Power efficiency2.4410.65
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGF100Seymour
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date31 May 2010 (15 years ago)7 January 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores352160
Core clock speed607 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt7 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate26.756.400
Floating-point processing power0.8554 TFLOPS0.256 TFLOPS
Compute performance30xno data
ROPs324
TMUs448
L1 Cache704 KB16 KB
L2 Cache512 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1603 MHz (3206 data rate)900 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.6 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIMini HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.24.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 465 6.35
+555%
HD 7470M 0.97

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 465 2656
+553%
Samples: 555
HD 7470M 407
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 41 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.35 0.97
Recency 31 May 2010 7 January 2012
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 7 Watt

GTX 465 has a 554.6% higher aggregate performance score.

HD 7470M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 2757.1% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 465 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7470M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 465 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 7470M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
GeForce GTX 465
AMD Radeon HD 7470M
Radeon HD 7470M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
RX 550 Radeon RX 550
HD 7470M Radeon HD 7470M
vs
GT 640M Mac Edition GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
HD 6950 Radeon HD 6950
GTX 460 NVIDIA GTX 460
vs
ATI HD 4670 4670
GTX 460 NVIDIA 460
vs
RTX 4070 Mobile 4070 Mobile
GTX 465 NVIDIA GTX 465
vs
GT 735M 735M
GTX 465 NVIDIA GTX 465
vs
GeForce 825M 825M
GTX 465 NVIDIA GTX 465
vs
GT 720M 720M
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
GTX 660 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
GTX 465 NVIDIA GTX 465
vs
GeForce 810A 810A
GTX 465 NVIDIA GTX 465
vs
GT 730A 730A
GTX 465 NVIDIA GTX 465
vs
GT 740A 740A
GTX 465 NVIDIA GTX 465
vs
ATI X700 LE X700 LE

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 126 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 120 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7470M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 465 or Radeon HD 7470M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.