Radeon HD 6990M vs GeForce GTX 465

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
460 460 768MB 460 OEM 460 SE 460 SE v2 460 v2 460 v2 ES 460 X2 465
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6950M 6970M 6970M Crossfire 6970M Mac Edition 6970M Rebrand 6970M X2 6990M 6990M Crossfire 6990M Rebrand

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 465 with Radeon HD 6990M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 465
2010, $279
1 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
6.35
+38.9%

GTX 465 outperforms HD 6990M by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 465 GTX 465
HD 6990M HD 6990M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking625700
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.08no data
Power efficiency2.443.52
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGF100Blackcomb
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date31 May 2010 (15 years ago)12 July 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3521120
Core clock speed607 MHz715 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million1,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt100 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate26.7540.04
Floating-point processing power0.8554 TFLOPS1.602 TFLOPS
Compute performance30xno data
ROPs3232
TMUs4456
L1 Cache704 KB224 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length241 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1603 MHz (3206 data rate)900 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.6 GB/s115.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIMini HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.24.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p75−80
+38.9%
54
−38.9%
Full HD80−85
+33.3%
60
−33.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.49no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how GTX 465 and HD 6990M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 465 is 39% faster in 900p
  • GTX 465 is 33% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 56 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.35 4.57
Recency 31 May 2010 12 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 100 Watt

GTX 465 has a 39% higher aggregate performance score.

HD 6990M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 100% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 465 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6990M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 465 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 6990M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
RX 550 Radeon RX 550
HD 6990M Radeon HD 6990M
vs
GTX 460M SLI GeForce GTX 460M SLI
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
HD 6950 Radeon HD 6950
GTX 460 GTX 460
vs
Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU
GTX 465 GTX 465
vs
R7 M360 R7 M360
GTX 465 GTX 465
vs
R7 M440 R7 M440
GTX 465 GTX 465
vs
GT 640M LE GT 640M LE
GTX 465 GTX 465
vs
GT 620M GT 620M
GTX 465 GTX 465
vs
HD 6950M HD 6950M
GTX 465 GTX 465
vs
HD 6720G2 HD 6720G2
GTX 465 GTX 465
vs
GT 435M GT 435M
GTX 465 465
vs
GTX 745 OEM 745 OEM
GTX 465 GTX 465
vs
HD 8570A HD 8570A

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 126 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 14 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6990M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 465 or Radeon HD 6990M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.