ATI Radeon 9550 vs GeForce GTX 465

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 465 and Radeon 9550, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 465
2010, $279
1 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
6.35
+7838%

GTX 465 outperforms 9550 by a whopping 7838% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6251533
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.08no data
Power efficiency2.44no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameGF100RV350
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date31 May 2010 (15 years ago)1 October 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores352no data
Core clock speed607 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate26.751.000
Floating-point processing power0.8554 TFLOPSno data
Compute performance30xno data
ROPs324
TMUs444
L1 Cache704 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Length241 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1603 MHz (3206 data rate)200 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.6 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIMini HDMI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.22.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 465 6.35
+7838%
ATI 9550 0.08

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 465 2645
+7679%
Samples: 557
ATI 9550 34
Samples: 180

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.35 0.08
Recency 31 May 2010 1 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 130 nm

GTX 465 has a 7838% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 225% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 465 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9550 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 126 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 63 votes

Rate Radeon 9550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 465 or Radeon 9550, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.