Radeon 660M vs GeForce GTX 465

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
460 460 768MB 460 OEM 460 SE 460 SE v2 460 v2 460 v2 ES 460 X2 465
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
610 610M 620 625 630 660M 680M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 465 with Radeon 660M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 465
2010, $279
1 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
6.35

660M outperforms GTX 465 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 465 GTX 465
Radeon 660M Radeon 660M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking625572
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.08no data
Power efficiency2.4414.82
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGF100Rembrandt+
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date31 May 2010 (15 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores352384
Core clock speed607 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt40 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate26.7545.60
Floating-point processing power0.8554 TFLOPS1.459 TFLOPS
Compute performance30xno data
ROPs3216
TMUs4424
Ray Tracing Coresno data6
L0 Cacheno data96 KB
L1 Cache704 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length241 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1603 MHz (3206 data rate)System Shared
Memory bandwidth102.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIMini HDMIPortable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 465 6.35
Radeon 660M 7.70
+21.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 465 2645
Samples: 557
Radeon 660M 3142
+18.8%
Samples: 11

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
−27.8%
23
+27.8%
4K10−12
−30%
13
+30%

Cost per frame, $

1080p15.50no data
4K27.90no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 78
+0%
78
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+0%
24
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 20
+0%
20
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 57
+0%
57
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20
+0%
20
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 23
+0%
23
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14
+0%
Dota 2 56
+0%
56
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 32
+0%
32
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
+0%
25
+0%
Metro Exodus 15
+0%
15
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+0%
26
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 48
+0%
48
+0%
Far Cry 5 25
+0%
25
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+0%
15
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how GTX 465 and Radeon 660M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 660M is 28% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 660M is 30% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.35 7.70
Recency 31 May 2010 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 40 Watt

Radeon 660M has a 21% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 567% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 660M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 465 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 465 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 660M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
RX 550 Radeon RX 550
Radeon 660M Radeon 660M
vs
GTX 680M GeForce GTX 680M
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
HD 6950 Radeon HD 6950
GTX 465 GTX 465
vs
GTX 480M 480M
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
ATI HD 4550 HD 4550
GTX 465 GTX 465
vs
GTX 260 260
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
E9171 MCM Radeon E9171 MCM
GTX 465 GTX 465
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB GP104 1060 6 GB GP104
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
HD 6970M X2 HD 6970M X2
9500 GT Mac Edition GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition
vs
9400 GT Rev. 2 GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2
9500 GT Mac Edition GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition
vs
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
9500 GT Mac Edition GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition
vs
T400 4 GB T400 4 GB
9500 GT Mac Edition GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition
vs
CMP 100HX-210 CMP 100HX-210

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 126 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 488 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 465 or Radeon 660M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.