ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730 vs GeForce GTX 465

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
460 460 768MB 460 OEM 460 SE 460 SE v2 460 v2 460 v2 ES 460 X2 465
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5145 5165 5430 5450 5470 5570 5650 5670 Mac Edition 5730 5750 5770 5830 5850 5850 Mac Edition 5870 5870 Crossfire

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 465 with Mobility Radeon HD 5730, including specs and performance data.

GTX 465
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
6.27
+386%

GTX 465 outperforms Mobility HD 5730 by a whopping 386% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 465 GTX 465
ATI Mobility HD 5730 Mobility HD 5730

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6171060
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.07no data
Power efficiency2.433.84
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGF100Madison
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date31 May 2010 (15 years ago)7 January 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores352400
Core clock speed607 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt26 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate26.7513.00
Floating-point processing power0.8554 TFLOPS0.52 TFLOPS
Compute performance30xno data
ROPs328
TMUs4420
L1 Cache704 KB40 KB
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1603 MHz (3206 data rate)800 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIMini HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.24.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p65−70
+364%
14
−364%
Full HD85−90
+372%
18
−372%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.28no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GTX 465 and ATI Mobility HD 5730 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 465 is 364% faster in 900p
  • GTX 465 is 372% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 49 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.27 1.29
Recency 31 May 2010 7 January 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 26 Watt

GTX 465 has a 386% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 months.

ATI Mobility HD 5730, on the other hand, has 669.2% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 465 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5730 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 465 is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 5730 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
GeForce GTX 465
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730
Mobility Radeon HD 5730
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
RX 550 Radeon RX 550
ATI Mobility HD 5730 Mobility Radeon HD 5730
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4830 Mobility Radeon HD 4830
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
HD 6950 Radeon HD 6950
GTX 460 GeForce GTX 460
vs
HD Graphics (Haswell) Graphics (Haswell)
GTX 460 GeForce GTX 460
vs
GeForce4 MX 420 MX 420
GTX 460 GeForce GTX 460
vs
Vega 8 Embedded Vega 8 Embedded
GTX 460 GeForce GTX 460
vs
RX Vega 5 RX Vega 5
GTX 460 GeForce GTX 460
vs
9600 GT Rev. 2 GeForce 9600 GT Rev. 2
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5470 Radeon HD 5470
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
ATI Mobility 9000 IGP Radeon 9000 IGP
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
Pro 580 Pro 580
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
RTX PRO 6000 PRO 6000
RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB
vs
GTX 465 465

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 125 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 16 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 465 or Mobility Radeon HD 5730, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.