GeForce GTX 570M vs GTX 465

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 465 GTX 470 GTX 470 PhysX Edition GTX 470 X2 GTX 480 GTX 480 Core 512 GTX 490
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 560M GTX 560M SLI GTX 570M GTX 580M GTX 580M SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 465 with GeForce GTX 570M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 465
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
6.86
+42.3%

GTX 465 outperforms GTX 570M by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 465 GTX 465
GTX 570M GTX 570M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking567648
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.23no data
Power efficiency2.374.43
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF100GF114
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date31 May 2010 (14 years ago)28 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores352336
Core clock speed607 MHz575 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate26.7532.20
Floating-point processing power0.8554 TFLOPS0.7728 TFLOPS
Compute performance30xno data
ROPs3224
TMUs4456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16PCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length241 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone
SLI options++

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1603 MHz (3206 data rate)1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.6 GB/s72.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIMini HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray-+
3D Gaming-+
Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 API
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.24.5
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 465 6.86
+42.3%
GTX 570M 4.82

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 465 2653
+42.4%
GTX 570M 1863

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p50−55
+35.1%
37
−35.1%
Full HD75−80
+41.5%
53
−41.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.72no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how GTX 465 and GTX 570M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 465 is 35% faster in 900p
  • GTX 465 is 42% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.86 4.82
Recency 31 May 2010 28 June 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1536 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 75 Watt

GTX 465 has a 42.3% higher aggregate performance score.

GTX 570M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 166.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 465 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 570M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 465 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 570M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
GeForce GTX 465
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
GeForce GTX 570M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
HD 6950 Radeon HD 6950
GTX 570M GeForce GTX 570M
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
RX 550 Radeon RX 550
GTX 460 GTX 460
vs
RX 6650M XT RX 6650M XT
GTX 460 GTX 460
vs
UHD Graphics 24EU UHD Graphics 24EU
GTX 460 GTX 460
vs
Arc A350 Arc A350
GTX 460 GTX 460
vs
RX 6550M RX 6550M
GTX 460 GTX 460
vs
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
GTX 465 GTX 465
vs
GeForce 930MX 930MX
GTX 465 GTX 465
vs
GeForce 840M 840M
GTX 465 GTX 465
vs
GT 740M GT 740M
GTX 465 GTX 465
vs
GeForce 920MX 920MX
GTX 465 GTX 465
vs
GT 635M GT 635M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 102 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 28 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 570M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 465 or GeForce GTX 570M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.