P106-100 vs GeForce GTX 460M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460M with P106-100, including specs and performance data.

GTX 460M
2010
1536 MB GDDR5, 50 Watt
2.75

P106-100 outperforms 460M by a whopping 455% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking807360
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.4410.26
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGF106GP106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 September 2010 (15 years ago)19 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1921280
Core clock speed675 MHz1506 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1709 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate21.60136.7
Floating-point processing power0.5184 TFLOPS4.375 TFLOPS
ROPs2448
TMUs3280
L1 Cache256 KB480 KB
L2 Cache384 KB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data250 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB6 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2002 MHz
Memory bandwidth60.0 GB/s192.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API with Feature Level 12.112 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+6.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 460M 2.75
P106-100 15.25
+455%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 460M 1214
Samples: 835
P106-100 6741
+455%
Samples: 115

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 460M 4278
P106-100 36066
+743%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p30
−433%
160−170
+433%
Full HD38
−453%
210−220
+453%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Fortnite 16−18
−431%
85−90
+431%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−433%
80−85
+433%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−436%
75−80
+436%
Valorant 45−50
−443%
250−260
+443%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
−445%
300−310
+445%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Dota 2 27−30
−452%
160−170
+452%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Fortnite 16−18
−431%
85−90
+431%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−433%
80−85
+433%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−436%
75−80
+436%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Valorant 45−50
−443%
250−260
+443%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Dota 2 27−30
−452%
160−170
+452%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−433%
80−85
+433%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−436%
75−80
+436%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Valorant 45−50
−443%
250−260
+443%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
−431%
85−90
+431%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−445%
120−130
+445%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−420%
130−140
+420%
Valorant 27−30
−436%
150−160
+436%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−431%
85−90
+431%
Valorant 14−16
−433%
80−85
+433%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%

This is how GTX 460M and P106-100 compete in popular games:

  • P106-100 is 433% faster in 900p
  • P106-100 is 453% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.75 15.25
Recency 3 September 2010 19 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 120 Watt

GTX 460M has 140% lower power consumption.

P106-100, on the other hand, has a 454.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The P106-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460M is a notebook graphics card while P106-100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
GeForce GTX 460M
NVIDIA P106-100
P106-100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 82 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 316 votes

Rate P106-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460M or P106-100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.