GeForce GT 710M vs GTX 460M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460M and GeForce GT 710M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 460M
2010
1536 MB GDDR5, 50 Watt
3.15
+174%

GTX 460M outperforms GT 710M by a whopping 174% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7521072
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.325.26
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF106GF117
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 September 2010 (14 years ago)9 January 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19296
Core clock speed675 MHz775 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate21.6012.40
Floating-point processing power0.5184 TFLOPS0.2976 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs3216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB1 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth60.0 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API with Feature Level 12.112 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 460M 3.15
+174%
GT 710M 1.15

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 460M 1213
+174%
GT 710M 442

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 460M 4119
+70.7%
GT 710M 2413

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p30
+200%
10−12
−200%
Full HD38
+217%
12−14
−217%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Battlefield 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Hitman 3 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+186%
14−16
−186%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Battlefield 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Hitman 3 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+186%
14−16
−186%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Hitman 3 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+186%
14−16
−186%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Hitman 3 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

This is how GTX 460M and GT 710M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 460M is 200% faster in 900p
  • GTX 460M is 217% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.15 1.15
Recency 3 September 2010 9 January 2013
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 15 Watt

GTX 460M has a 173.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GT 710M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 460M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 710M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
GeForce GTX 460M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
GeForce GT 710M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 77 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 219 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.