ATI Radeon 7500 vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460M SLI with Radeon 7500, including specs and performance data.

GTX 460M SLI
2010
2x1536 MB GDDR5
4.55
+45400%

460M SLI outperforms 7500 by a whopping 45400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7021597
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.03
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameN11E-GSRV200
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 September 2010 (15 years ago)14 August 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed675 MHz290 MHz
Number of transistorsno data60 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data23 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.740
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2x1536 MB64 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz230 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data7.36 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX117.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p52-0−1
Full HD67-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 20−22 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Resident Evil 4 Remake 7−8 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 18−20 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 20−22 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 14−16 0−1
Fortnite 27−30 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 0−1
Valorant 55−60 0−1

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 18−20 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 20−22 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Dota 2 40−45 0−1
Far Cry 5 14−16 0−1
Fortnite 27−30 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 12−14 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Metro Exodus 9−10 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 0−1
Valorant 55−60 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Dota 2 40−45 0−1
Far Cry 5 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 0−1
Valorant 55−60 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 27−30 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 0−1
Valorant 45−50 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 9−10 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Valorant 21−24 0−1

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.55 0.01
Recency 3 September 2010 14 August 2001
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

GTX 460M SLI has a 45400% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 460M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 7500 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 7500 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce GTX 460M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 50 votes

Rate Radeon 7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460M SLI or Radeon 7500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.