Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce GTX 460

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460 with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX 460
2010
2 GB GDDR5, 160 Watt
5.49
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
25.52
+365%

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms GTX 460 by a whopping 365% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking602209
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.18no data
Power efficiency2.5353.75
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF104AD107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date12 July 2010 (14 years ago)26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3362048
Core clock speed675 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2025 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate37.80129.6
Floating-point processing power0.9072 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs5664
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length210 mmno data
Height4.376"(111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMIPortable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 460 5.49
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 25.52
+365%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 460 2570
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136
+450%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.49 25.52
Recency 12 July 2010 26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 35 Watt

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 364.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 357.1% lower power consumption.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 is a desktop card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
GeForce GTX 460
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1028 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 20 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.