Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) vs GeForce GTX 460 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 645 OEM GTX 460 SE v2 GTX 460 v2 GTX 460 v2 ES GTX 555 OEM GTX 560 GTX 560 SE GTX 560 Ti GTX 560 Ti OEM GTX 560 Ti X2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
R4 (Beema) R4 (Kaveri) R4 (Stoney Ridge) R4 Mobile Graphics R4E Mobile Graphics R5 (Stoney Ridge) R5 M330 R5 M430 R7 (Carrizo) R7 M340 R7 M440 R9 M360

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460 v2 with Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge), including specs and performance data.

GTX 460 v2
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 160 Watt
4.66
+340%

GTX 460 v2 outperforms R4 (Stoney Ridge) by a whopping 340% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 460 v2 GTX 460 v2
R4 (Stoney Ridge) R4 (Stoney Ridge)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6731119
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.81no data
Power efficiency2.225.39
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameGF114Stoney Ridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date24 September 2011 (13 years ago)1 June 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336192
Core clock speed779 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data600 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate43.62no data
Floating-point processing power1.046 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24no data
TMUs56no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth96.19 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMIno data
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
+289%
9
−289%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.69no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
God of War 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
God of War 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
God of War 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
God of War 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
God of War 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GTX 460 v2 and R4 (Stoney Ridge) compete in popular games:

  • GTX 460 v2 is 289% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 39 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.66 1.06
Recency 24 September 2011 1 June 2016
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 15 Watt

GTX 460 v2 has a 339.6% higher aggregate performance score.

R4 (Stoney Ridge), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 966.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 v2 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
GeForce GTX 460 v2
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 460 v2 GeForce GTX 460 v2
vs
HD 6850 Radeon HD 6850
R4 (Stoney Ridge) Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
vs
GeForce 710M GeForce 710M
GTX 460 v2 GeForce GTX 460 v2
vs
RX 570X Radeon RX 570X
GeForce 405M GeForce 405M
vs
GT 610 PCI GT 610 PCI
RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090
vs
GT 610 PCI GT 610 PCI
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770
vs
GTX 560 SE GTX 560 SE
RX 6500 Radeon RX 6500
vs
GTX 560 Ti 448 GTX 560 Ti 448
HD 8790M Radeon HD 8790M
vs
GTX 460 v2 GTX 460 v2
GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps
vs
GTX 460 v2 460 v2
R7 M360 Radeon R7 M360
vs
GTX 560 GTX 560
Vega 8 Efficient Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
vs
GTX 560 GTX 560
Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU M1 Max 32-Core GPU
vs
GTX 560 GTX 560
RTX 5070 Ti GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
vs
GT 530 OEM GT 530 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 19 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 128 votes

Rate Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460 v2 or Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.