Radeon HD 8570D vs GeForce GTX 460 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 645 OEM GTX 460 SE v2 GTX 460 v2 GTX 460 v2 ES GTX 555 OEM GTX 560 GTX 560 SE GTX 560 Ti GTX 560 Ti OEM GTX 560 Ti X2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8510 OEM 8550 OEM 8550D IGP 8570 OEM 8570 OEM Rebrand 8570D

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon HD 8570D, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 460 v2
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 160 Watt
4.42
+370%

460 v2 outperforms HD 8570D by a whopping 370% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 460 v2 GTX 460 v2
HD 8570D HD 8570D

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6821144
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.78no data
Power efficiency2.231.17
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameGF114Devastator Lite
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date24 September 2011 (14 years ago)10 July 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336256
Core clock speed779 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data868 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate43.6213.89
Floating-point processing power1.046 TFLOPS0.4444 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs5616
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache384 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1002 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth96.19 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 460 v2 4.42
+370%
HD 8570D 0.94

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 460 v2 1954
+371%
Samples: 219
HD 8570D 415
Samples: 1078

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
+362%
13
−362%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.32no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
+0%
6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GTX 460 v2 and HD 8570D compete in popular games:

  • GTX 460 v2 is 362% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 43 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.42 0.94
Recency 24 September 2011 10 July 2013
Chip lithography 40 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 65 Watt

GTX 460 v2 has a 370.2% higher aggregate performance score.

HD 8570D, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 146.2% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8570D in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
GeForce GTX 460 v2
AMD Radeon HD 8570D
Radeon HD 8570D
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 460 v2 GeForce GTX 460 v2
vs
HD 6850 Radeon HD 6850
HD 8570D Radeon HD 8570D
vs
HD 6550D Radeon HD 6550D
GTX 460 v2 GeForce GTX 460 v2
vs
RX 570X Radeon RX 570X
RX 5700 XT RX 5700 XT
vs
GT 645 OEM GT 645 OEM
UHD Graphics 710 UHD Graphics 710
vs
GT 610 PCI GT 610 PCI
W5000 DVI W5000 DVI
vs
GTX 560 SE GTX 560 SE
RX 6700 RX 6700
vs
GTX 560 SE GTX 560 SE
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770
vs
510 OEM 510 OEM
GTX 960 OEM 960 OEM
vs
GTX 460 v2 460 v2
W5000 DVI W5000 DVI
vs
GTX 460 v2 GTX 460 v2
RX 6700 RX 6700
vs
GTX 460 v2 GTX 460 v2
W5000 DVI W5000 DVI
vs
GTX 560 GTX 560
ATI Mobility HD 4650 Mobility HD 4650
vs
GT 545 GT 545

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 20 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 103 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8570D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460 v2 or Radeon HD 8570D, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.