GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile vs GTX 460 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460 SE with GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX 460 SE
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
5.15

RTX 5090 Mobile outperforms GTX 460 SE by a whopping 1325% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking63118
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.21no data
Power efficiency2.3653.11
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGF104GB203
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 November 2010 (14 years ago)2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$160 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28810496
Core clock speed650 MHz990 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1515 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt95 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature104 °Cno data
Texture fill rate31.20496.9
Floating-point processing power0.7488 TFLOPS31.8 TFLOPS
ROPs32128
TMUs48328
Tensor Coresno data328
Ray Tracing Coresno data82

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length210 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount1 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1700 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth108.8 GB/s811.5 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Number of display connectors2no data
Display Connectors2 x Dual-Link DVI-I1 x Mini HDMI1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA+10.1
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 460 SE 5.15
RTX 5090 Mobile 73.40
+1325%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 460 SE 1986
RTX 5090 Mobile 28280
+1324%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.15 73.40
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 95 Watt

RTX 5090 Mobile has a 1325.2% higher aggregate performance score, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 900% more advanced lithography process, and 57.9% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 SE in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 SE is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
GeForce GTX 460 SE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 143 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 63 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460 SE or GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.