FirePro V7900 vs GeForce GTX 460 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460 SE with FirePro V7900, including specs and performance data.

GTX 460 SE
2010, $160
1 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
4.76

V7900 outperforms 460 SE by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking689663
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.06no data
Power efficiency2.442.77
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameGF104Cayman
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date15 November 2010 (15 years ago)24 May 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$160 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2881280
Core clock speed650 MHz725 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million2,640 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt151 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature104 °Cno data
Texture fill rate31.2058.00
Floating-point processing power0.7488 TFLOPS1.856 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs4880
L1 Cache384 KB320 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0PCIe 2.1 x16
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length210 mm279 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1700 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth108.8 GB/s160 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Number of display connectors2no data
Display Connectors2 x Dual-Link DVI-I1 x Mini HDMI4x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
StereoOutput3D-+
DisplayPort countno data4
Dual-link DVI support-+
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.14.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 460 SE 4.76
FirePro V7900 5.40
+13.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 460 SE 1990
Samples: 712
FirePro V7900 2260
+13.6%
Samples: 80

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.76 5.40
Recency 15 November 2010 24 May 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 151 Watt

GTX 460 SE has 1% lower power consumption.

FirePro V7900, on the other hand, has a 13% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The FirePro V7900 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 SE in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 SE is a desktop graphics card while FirePro V7900 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 151 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 18 votes

Rate FirePro V7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460 SE or FirePro V7900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.