Radeon RX 5500M vs GeForce GTX 460 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
460 OEM 460 SE 460 SE v2 460 v2 460 v2 ES 460 X2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5300M 5500M 5600M 5700M 6550M 6600M 6800M 7600M 7600M XT 7700S 7900M 8060S

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460 OEM with Radeon RX 5500M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 460 OEM
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
2.82

5500M outperforms 460 OEM by a whopping 407% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 OEM
RX 5500M RX 5500M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking836402
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.4512.96
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGF104Navi 14
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 October 2010 (15 years ago)7 October 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3361408
Core clock speed650 MHz1375 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1645 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate36.40144.8
Floating-point processing power0.8736 TFLOPS4.632 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs5688
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed850 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth108.8 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−470%
57
+470%
1440p12−14
−408%
61
+408%
4K5−6
−500%
30
+500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 53
+0%
53
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 55
+0%
55
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 68
+0%
68
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 53
+0%
53
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 43
+0%
43
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 146
+0%
146
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 93
+0%
93
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 48
+0%
48
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 191
+0%
191
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 33
+0%
33
+0%
Dota 2 106
+0%
106
+0%
Far Cry 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 79
+0%
79
+0%
Metro Exodus 39
+0%
39
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+0%
72
+0%
Valorant 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75
+0%
75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Dota 2 103
+0%
103
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 59
+0%
59
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+0%
45
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 65
+0%
65
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 137
+0%
137
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 25
+0%
25
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 175
+0%
175
+0%
Valorant 136
+0%
136
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 76
+0%
76
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20
+0%
20
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 129
+0%
129
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 53
+0%
53
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how GTX 460 OEM and RX 5500M compete in popular games:

  • RX 5500M is 470% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5500M is 408% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5500M is 500% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.82 14.31
Recency 11 October 2010 7 October 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 85 Watt

RX 5500M has a 407% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 471% more advanced lithography process, and 76% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 5500M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 OEM in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX 5500M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 460 OEM GeForce GTX 460 OEM
vs
R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
RX 5500M Radeon RX 5500M
vs
GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB
GTX 460 OEM GeForce GTX 460 OEM
vs
ATI HD 5750 Radeon HD 5750
GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 OEM
vs
Xbox One GPU Xbox One GPU
GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 OEM
vs
ATI HD 4670 HD 4670
GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 OEM
vs
ATI 9000 PRO 9000 PRO
GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 OEM
vs
8600 GT 8600 GT
GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 OEM
vs
RX 560X RX 560X
GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 OEM
vs
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 OEM
vs
RX 6750 GRE RX 6750 GRE
GTX 460 OEM 460 OEM
vs
RTX 5090 D V2 5090 D V2
405 OEM 405 OEM
vs
GeForce4 MX 440-8x GeForce4 MX 440-8x
405 OEM 405 OEM
vs
GMA X4500HD GMA X4500HD

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 20 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 373 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460 OEM or Radeon RX 5500M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.