Radeon HD 7650M vs GeForce GTX 460 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
460 OEM 460 SE 460 SE v2 460 v2 460 v2 ES 460 X2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7510M 7530M 7550M 7570M 7590M 7630M 7650M 7670M 7690M 7690M XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460 OEM with Radeon HD 7650M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 460 OEM
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
2.65
+168%

460 OEM outperforms HD 7650M by a whopping 168% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 OEM
HD 7650M HD 7650M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8251129
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.423.99
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGF104Thames
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 October 2010 (14 years ago)7 January 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336480
Core clock speed650 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speedno data550 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate36.4010.80
Floating-point processing power0.8736 TFLOPS0.432 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs5624
L1 Cache448 KB48 KB
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed850 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth108.8 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p45−50
+150%
18
−150%
Full HD50−55
+163%
19
−163%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GTX 460 OEM and HD 7650M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 460 OEM is 150% faster in 900p
  • GTX 460 OEM is 163% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 44 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.65 0.99
Recency 11 October 2010 7 January 2012
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 20 Watt

GTX 460 OEM has a 167.7% higher aggregate performance score.

HD 7650M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 650% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7650M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 7650M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
GeForce GTX 460 OEM
AMD Radeon HD 7650M
Radeon HD 7650M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 460 OEM GeForce GTX 460 OEM
vs
R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
HD 7650M Radeon HD 7650M
vs
GT 720M GeForce GT 720M
GTX 460 OEM GeForce GTX 460 OEM
vs
ATI HD 5750 Radeon HD 5750
RTX 3050 8 GB RTX 3050 8 GB
vs
ATI Video Xpression+ Video Xpression+
GT 720A GT 720A
vs
GTX 460 SE GTX 460 SE
GeForce MX330 MX330
vs
GTX 460 SE GTX 460 SE
RTX 4060 Mobile 4060 Mobile
vs
GTX 460 SE 460 SE
6600 GT Dual 6600 GT Dual
vs
GT 440 OEM GT 440 OEM
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
vs
GT 420 OEM GT 420 OEM
GeForce4 MX 440-8x GeForce4 MX 440-8x
vs
8400 GS Rev. 3 8400 GS Rev. 3
ATI Mobility HD 4570 Mobility HD 4570
vs
GTX 460 GTX 460
GT 650M Mac Edition GT 650M Mac Edition
vs
GTX 460 GTX 460
ATI HD 4650 AGP HD 4650 AGP
vs
GTX 460 GTX 460

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 18 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 83 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460 OEM or Radeon HD 7650M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.