GeForce RTX 5060 vs GTX 460 OEM

#ad 
Buy GeForce GTX 460 OEM
460 OEM 460 SE 460 SE v2 460 v2 460 v2 ES 460 X2
VS
5060 5060 Ti 5060 Ti 8 GB 5060 Ti 16 GB

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460 OEM and GeForce RTX 5060, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 460 OEM
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
2.74

RTX 5060 outperforms GTX 460 OEM by a whopping 604% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 OEM
RTX 5060 RTX 5060

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking809282
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.369.92
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGF104GB206
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date11 October 2010 (14 years ago)May 2025
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3363840
Core clock speed650 MHz2280 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2497 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt145 Watt
Texture fill rate36.40299.6
Floating-point processing power0.8736 TFLOPS19.18 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs56120
Tensor Coresno data120
Ray Tracing Coresno data30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Length210 mm241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed850 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth108.8 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA2.112.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.74 19.28
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 145 Watt

RTX 5060 has a 603.6% higher aggregate performance score, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 3.4% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 5060 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 OEM in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
GeForce GTX 460 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
GeForce RTX 5060
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 460 OEM GeForce GTX 460 OEM
vs
ATI HD 5750 Radeon HD 5750
RTX 5060 GeForce RTX 5060
vs
RX 470 Radeon RX 470
GTX 460 OEM GeForce GTX 460 OEM
vs
GT 640 GeForce GT 640
GT 440 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 OEM
vs
RTX 5060 RTX 5060
GT 440 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 OEM
vs
RTX 5070 RTX 5070
GTS 450 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM
vs
RTX 5090 RTX 5090
GTS 450 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM
vs
RTX 5070 RTX 5070
GTX 460 OEM GeForce GTX 460 OEM
vs
RTX 5050 RTX 5050
405 OEM NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
vs
RTX 5050 RTX 5050
405 OEM NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
vs
RTX 5070 RTX 5070
405 OEM NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
vs
RTX 5080 RTX 5080
GT 415 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM
vs
RTX 5070 RTX 5070
GT 420 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
vs
RTX 5090 RTX 5090

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 17 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 528 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460 OEM or GeForce RTX 5060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.