FirePro W2100 vs GeForce GTX 460 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
460 OEM 460 SE 460 SE v2 460 v2 460 v2 ES 460 X2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
W2100 W4100 W4300 W5000 W5000 DVI W5100 W7000 W7100 W8000 W8100 W9000 W9100

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460 OEM with FirePro W2100, including specs and performance data.

GTX 460 OEM
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
2.77
+30%

460 OEM outperforms W2100 by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 OEM
FirePro W2100 FirePro W2100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking829911
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.446.38
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGF104Oland
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date11 October 2010 (15 years ago)12 August 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336320
Core clock speed650 MHz630 MHz
Boost clock speedno data680 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt26 Watt
Texture fill rate36.4013.60
Floating-point processing power0.8736 TFLOPS0.4352 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs5620
L1 Cache448 KB80 KB
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorno datalow profile / half length
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed850 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth108.8 GB/s28.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI2x DisplayPort
HDMI+-
DisplayPort countno data2
Dual-link DVI support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
+16.7%
12
−16.7%
4K2−3
+0%
2
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how GTX 460 OEM and FirePro W2100 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 460 OEM is 17% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.77 2.13
Recency 11 October 2010 12 August 2014
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 26 Watt

GTX 460 OEM has a 30% higher aggregate performance score.

FirePro W2100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 476.9% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 OEM is a desktop graphics card while FirePro W2100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
GeForce GTX 460 OEM
AMD FirePro W2100
FirePro W2100
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 460 OEM GeForce GTX 460 OEM
vs
R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
FirePro W2100 FirePro W2100
vs
GRID K220Q GRID K220Q
GTX 460 OEM GeForce GTX 460 OEM
vs
GT 640 GeForce GT 640
GTX 460 SE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
vs
Radeon 530X Radeon 530X
GTX 460 SE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
vs
RX 560DX RX 560DX
GT 430 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM
vs
R2 Mobile Graphics R2 Mobile Graphics
GT 430 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM
vs
9200M GS GDDR3 GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
GTS 450 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM
vs
RX 6600S RX 6600S
GTX 460 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
vs
R7 Graphics R7 Graphics
405 OEM NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
vs
UHD Graphics 605 Graphics 605
405 OEM NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
vs
MX450 30.5W 8Gbps GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps
405 OEM NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
vs
H200 NVL H200 NVL
GT 415 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM
vs
UHD Graphics 615 Graphics 615

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 19 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 100 votes

Rate FirePro W2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460 OEM or FirePro W2100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.