RTX A5500 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 295

Place in the ranking	758	75
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.14	no data
Power efficiency	0.75	18.98
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GT200B	GA103
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	8 January 2009 (16 years ago)	22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$500	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	480	7424
CUDA cores per GPU	240	no data
Core clock speed	576 MHz	975 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1500 MHz
Number of transistors	1,400 million	22,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	289 Watt	165 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	46.08	348.0
Floating-point processing power	0.5962 TFLOPS	22.27 TFLOPS
ROPs	28	96
TMUs	80	232
Tensor Cores	no data	232
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	58

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1792 MB	16 GB
Standard memory config per GPU	896 MB	no data
Memory bus width	896 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	999 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	223.8 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Memory interface width per GPU	448 Bit	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Two Dual Link DVIHDMI	Portable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)

128bit

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.0	6.7
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	+	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 295 3.14

RTX A5500 Mobile 45.43
+1347%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 295 1206

RTX A5500 Mobile 17463
+1348%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	8−9 −1450%	124 +1450%
1440p	5−6 −1520%	81 +1520%
4K	3−4 −1767%	56 +1767%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	62.50	no data
1440p	100.00	no data
4K	166.67	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	129 +0%	129 +0%
Elden Ring	129 +0%	129 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	57 +0%	57 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	244 +0%	244 +0%
Metro Exodus	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Valorant	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	44 +0%	44 +0%
Dota 2	151 +0%	151 +0%
Elden Ring	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Far Cry 5	108 +0%	108 +0%
Fortnite	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	200 +0%	200 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	145 +0%	145 +0%
Metro Exodus	38 +0%	38 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Valorant	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	38 +0%	38 +0%
Dota 2	155 +0%	155 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	178 +0%	178 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Valorant	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	99 +0%	99 +0%
Elden Ring	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	99 +0%	99 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
World of Tanks	280−290 +0%	280−290 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	23 +0%	23 +0%
Far Cry 5	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	129 +0%	129 +0%
Metro Exodus	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Valorant	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Dota 2	97 +0%	97 +0%
Elden Ring	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	97 +0%	97 +0%
Metro Exodus	31 +0%	31 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	97 +0%	97 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	9 +0%	9 +0%
Dota 2	132 +0%	132 +0%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Fortnite	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	68 +0%	68 +0%
Valorant	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

This is how GTX 295 and RTX A5500 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX A5500 Mobile is 1450% faster in 1080p
RTX A5500 Mobile is 1520% faster in 1440p
RTX A5500 Mobile is 1767% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.14	45.43
Recency	8 January 2009	22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	1792 MB	16 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	289 Watt	165 Watt

RTX A5500 Mobile has a 1346.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 814.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 587.5% more advanced lithography process, and 75.2% lower power consumption.

The RTX A5500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 295 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 295 is a desktop card while RTX A5500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.