GeForce RTX 5070 Ti vs GTX 295

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
260 Core 216 Rev. 2 260 Rev. 2 275 275 PhysX Edition 285 285 Mac Edition 285 X2 295 295 Single PCB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5050 5060 5060 Ti 5060 Ti 8 GB 5060 Ti 16 GB 5070 5070 SUPER 5070 Ti 5070 Ti SUPER 5080 5080 SUPER 5090 5090 D 5090 DD 5090 D V2

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 295
2009, $500
1792 MB GDDR3, 289 Watt
2.87

RTX 5070 Ti outperforms GTX 295 by a whopping 2614% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 295 GTX 295
RTX 5070 Ti RTX 5070 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8199
Place by popularitynot in top-10033
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.1260.43
Power efficiency0.7619.94
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGT200BGB203
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date8 January 2009 (16 years ago)20 February 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$500 $749

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RTX 5070 Ti has 50258% better value for money than GTX 295.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480 ×28960
CUDA cores per GPU240no data
Core clock speed576 MHz2295 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2452 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)289 Watt300 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate46.08 ×2686.6
Floating-point processing power0.5962 TFLOPS ×243.94 TFLOPS
ROPs28 ×296
TMUs80 ×2280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70
L1 Cacheno data8.8 MB
L2 Cache224 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm304 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 16-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount1792 MB ×216 GB
Standard memory config per GPU896 MBno data
Memory bus width896 Bit ×2256 Bit
Memory clock speed999 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth223.8 GB/s ×2896.0 GB/s
Memory interface width per GPU448 Bitno data
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIHDMI1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)128bitno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA+12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 295 2.87
RTX 5070 Ti 77.90
+2614%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 295 1200
Samples: 458
RTX 5070 Ti 32596
+2616%
Samples: 8990

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8−9
−2863%
237
+2863%
1440p5−6
−2660%
138
+2660%
4K3−4
−2867%
89
+2867%

Cost per frame, $

1080p62.50
−1878%
3.16
+1878%
1440p100.00
−1742%
5.43
+1742%
4K166.67
−1880%
8.42
+1880%
  • RTX 5070 Ti has 1878% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 5070 Ti has 1742% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 5070 Ti has 1880% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 338
+0%
338
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 321
+0%
321
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Metro Exodus 241
+0%
241
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 529
+0%
529
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 304
+0%
304
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 251
+0%
251
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Metro Exodus 153
+0%
153
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 260
+0%
260
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 206
+0%
206
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 101
+0%
101
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 198
+0%
198
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 147
+0%
147
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how GTX 295 and RTX 5070 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5070 Ti is 2863% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5070 Ti is 2660% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5070 Ti is 2867% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.87 77.90
Recency 8 January 2009 20 February 2025
Maximum RAM amount 1792 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 289 Watt 300 Watt

GTX 295 has 3.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 5070 Ti, on the other hand, has a 2614.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 814.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 295 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 295
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 295 GeForce GTX 295
vs
GTX 260 GeForce GTX 260
RTX 5070 Ti GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
vs
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GTX 295 GeForce GTX 295
vs
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
GTX 295 GTX 295
vs
Tegra 4i Tegra 4i
GTX 295 GTX 295
vs
Tegra 4 GPU Tegra 4 GPU
GTX 295 GTX 295
vs
Tegra 4i GPU Tegra 4i GPU
GTX 295 GTX 295
vs
Tegra 3 GPU Tegra 3 GPU
GTX 295 GTX 295
vs
Tegra 2 GPU Tegra 2 GPU
GTX 285 GTX 285
vs
HD Graphics P530 HD Graphics P530
GTX 285 GTX 285
vs
HD 8330 HD 8330
GTX 285 GTX 285
vs
R5 310 OEM R5 310 OEM
GTX 285 GTX 285
vs
R5 220 OEM R5 220 OEM
GTX 285 GTX 285
vs
R5 230 OEM R5 230 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 90 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 3339 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 295 or GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.