RTX 2060 vs GTX 295

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

GTX 295
3.07

RTX 2060 outperforms GTX 295 by 1089% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking720121
Place by popularitynot in top-10024
Value for money0.1521.00
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGT200BTuring TU106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date8 January 2009 (15 years old)6 January 2019 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$500 $349
Current price$200 (0.4x MSRP)$397 (1.1x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2060 has 13900% better value for money than GTX 295.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2401920
CUDA cores480no data
CUDA cores per GPU240no data
Core clock speed576 MHz1320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1620 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)289 Watt175 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate92.2 billion/sec201.6
Floating-point performance2x 596.2 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)229 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors6-pin & 8-pin1x 8-pin
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1792 MB6 GB
Standard memory config per GPU896 MBno data
Memory bus width896 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed999 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth223.8 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Memory interface width per GPU448 Bitno data
Shared memoryno data-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIHDMI1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC supportno data+
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)128bitno data
VR Readyno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 295 3.07
RTX 2060 36.50
+1089%

RTX 2060 outperforms GTX 295 by 1089% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 295 1190
RTX 2060 14150
+1089%

RTX 2060 outperforms GTX 295 by 1089% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−1110%
121
+1110%
1440p6−7
−1167%
76
+1167%
4K4−5
−1150%
50
+1150%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 3.07 36.50
Recency 8 January 2009 6 January 2019
Cost $500 $349
Maximum RAM amount 1792 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 289 Watt 175 Watt

The GeForce RTX 2060 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 295 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 295
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 76 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 8841 vote

Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.