GeForce GTX 670MX SLI vs GTX 295

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
260 Core 216 Rev. 2 260 Rev. 2 275 275 PhysX Edition 285 285 Mac Edition 285 X2 295 295 Single PCB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
670M 670MX 670MX SLI 675M 675M SLI 675MX 675MX Mac Edition

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 295 with GeForce GTX 670MX SLI, including specs and performance data.

GTX 295
2009, $500
1792 MB GDDR3, 289 Watt
2.87

670MX SLI outperforms GTX 295 by a whopping 218% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 295 GTX 295
GTX 670MX SLI GTX 670MX SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking818512
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.12no data
Power efficiency0.764.67
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGT200BN13E-GR
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date8 January 2009 (16 years ago)1 October 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$500 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480 ×21920
CUDA cores per GPU240no data
Core clock speed576 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million5080 Million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)289 Watt150 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate46.08 ×2no data
Floating-point processing power0.5962 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs28 ×2no data
TMUs80 ×2no data
L2 Cache224 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options++

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1792 MB ×2no data
Standard memory config per GPU896 MBno data
Memory bus width896 Bit ×22x 192 Bit
Memory clock speed999 MHz2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth223.8 GB/s ×2no data
Memory interface width per GPU448 Bitno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIHDMIno data
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)128bitno data
Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−238%
71
+238%

Cost per frame, $

1080p23.81no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 168
+0%
168
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how GTX 295 and GTX 670MX SLI compete in popular games:

  • GTX 670MX SLI is 238% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.87 9.14
Recency 8 January 2009 1 October 2012
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 289 Watt 150 Watt

GTX 670MX SLI has a 218.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 92.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 295 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 295 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 295
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 295 GeForce GTX 295
vs
GTX 260 GeForce GTX 260
GTX 670MX SLI GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
vs
GTX 580M SLI GeForce GTX 580M SLI
GTX 295 GeForce GTX 295
vs
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
GTX 275 GeForce GTX 275
vs
GTX 960M GeForce GTX 960M
GTX 275 GeForce GTX 275
vs
GTX 460 768MB GeForce GTX 460 768MB
GTX 275 NVIDIA GTX 275
vs
R9 270 1024SP 270 1024SP
GTX 275 NVIDIA GTX 275
vs
GTS 150 OEM 150 OEM
GTX 285 Mac Edition NVIDIA GTX 285 Mac Edition
vs
Arc A580 A580
GTX 295 NVIDIA GTX 295
vs
HD 6850 X2 6850 X2
GTX 295 GeForce GTX 295
vs
GTX 780 6 GB GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
GTX 295 NVIDIA GTX 295
vs
605 OEM 605 OEM
GTX 295 NVIDIA GTX 295
vs
ATI Xbox 360 GPU 360 GPU
GTX 295 NVIDIA GTX 295
vs
RX Vega 11 Vega 11

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 90 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 670MX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 295 or GeForce GTX 670MX SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.