ATI FirePro V7750 vs GeForce GTX 285M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1044not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.44no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG92RV730
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 February 2010 (16 years ago)27 March 2009 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128320
Core clock speed600 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors754 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt76 Watt
Texture fill rate38.4025.60
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS0.512 TFLOPS
Gigaflops576no data
ROPs168
TMUs6432
L1 Cacheno data64 KB
L2 Cache64 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data234 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options2-way-
MXM TypeMXM 3.0 Type-Bno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 1020 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth61 GB/s28.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsSingle Link DVIVGALVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPort1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2010 27 March 2009
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 76 Watt

GTX 285M has an age advantage of 10 months, and 1% lower power consumption.

ATI V7750, on the other hand, has a 18% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 285M and FirePro V7750. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 285M is a notebook graphics card while FirePro V7750 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FirePro V7750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 285M or FirePro V7750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.