GeForce GTX 285M vs ATI FirePro V8700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1044
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.44
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV770G92
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date11 September 2008 (17 years ago)1 February 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800128
Core clock speed750 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors956 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)151 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate30.0038.40
Floating-point processing power1.2 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data576
ROPs1616
TMUs4064
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length254 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options-2-way
MXM Typeno dataMXM 3.0 Type-B

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed850 MHzUp to 1020 MHz
Memory bandwidth108.8 GB/s61 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoSingle Link DVIVGALVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPort
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2008 1 February 2010
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 151 Watt 75 Watt

ATI V8700 has a 18% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 285M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 101% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V8700 and GeForce GTX 285M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V8700 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 285M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate FirePro V8700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V8700 or GeForce GTX 285M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.