P106-090 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
260M 260M SLI 280M 280M SLI 285M 285M SLI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P104-100 P106-090 P106-100 P400 P2000 P2200 P4000 P5000 Tesla P4 Tesla P40 Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 285M SLI with P106-090, including specs and performance data.

GTX 285M SLI
2009
2 GB GDDR3, 150 Watt
3.76

P106-090 outperforms 285M SLI by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 285M SLI GTX 285M SLI
P106-090 P106-090

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking751639
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.945.86
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameN10E-GTXGP106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2 March 2009 (16 years ago)31 July 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256768
Core clock speed576 MHz1354 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1531 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data73.49
Floating-point processing powerno data2.352 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data48
L1 Cacheno data288 KB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x1
Lengthno data250 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB3 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1020 MHz2002 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60
−50%
90−95
+50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Fortnite 21−24
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Valorant 50−55
−50.9%
80−85
+50.9%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−44.9%
100−105
+44.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Dota 2 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Fortnite 21−24
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Valorant 50−55
−50.9%
80−85
+50.9%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Dota 2 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Valorant 50−55
−50.9%
80−85
+50.9%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Valorant 40−45
−50%
60−65
+50%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Valorant 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

This is how GTX 285M SLI and P106-090 compete in popular games:

  • P106-090 is 50% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.76 5.68
Recency 2 March 2009 31 July 2017
Chip lithography 55 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 75 Watt

P106-090 has a 51.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 243.8% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The P106-090 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 285M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a notebook graphics card while P106-090 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M SLI
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
NVIDIA P106-090
P106-090
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 285M SLI GeForce GTX 285M SLI
vs
Radeon 630 Radeon 630
P106-090 P106 090
vs
FireStream 9370 FireStream 9370
GTX 285M SLI GeForce GTX 285M SLI
vs
R9 M370X Radeon R9 M370X
GT 650M SLI NVIDIA GT 650M SLI
vs
Radeon 780M 780M
ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire ATI Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
vs
HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
GTX 460 768MB NVIDIA GTX 460 768MB
vs
HD 7470A 7470A
HD 6790 AMD HD 6790
vs
GTX 760 X2 760 X2
GTX 285M SLI NVIDIA GTX 285M SLI
vs
GeForce G105M G105M
HD 6970M AMD HD 6970M
vs
K1100M K1100M
ATI HD 5770 ATI HD 5770
vs
GeForce 9800S 9800S
ATI HD 5770 ATI HD 5770
vs
ATI V3800 V3800
GTX 280M SLI NVIDIA GTX 280M SLI
vs
P106-090 090
HD 6950M AMD HD 6950M
vs
GT 625 OEM 625 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 62 votes

Rate P106-090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 285M SLI or P106-090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.