GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs GTX 285M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
260M 260M SLI 280M 280M SLI 285M 285M SLI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4070 AD103 4070 GDDR6 4070 SUPER 4070 Ti 4070 Ti SUPER 4070 Ti SUPER AD102

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 285M SLI with GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, including specs and performance data.

GTX 285M SLI
2009
2 GB GDDR3, 150 Watt
3.81

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms 285M SLI by a whopping 1896% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 285M SLI GTX 285M SLI
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking75210
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data55.11
Power efficiency1.9520.50
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameN10E-GTXAD103
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 March 2009 (16 years ago)8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2568448
Core clock speed576 MHz2340 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2610 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rateno data689.0
Floating-point processing powerno data44.1 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data264
Tensor Coresno data264
Ray Tracing Coresno data66
L1 Cacheno data8.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data310 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1020 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data672.3 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+8.9
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60
−273%
224
+273%
1440p7−8
−2000%
147
+2000%
4K4−5
−2125%
89
+2125%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.57
1440pno data5.44
4Kno data8.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−2087%
300−350
+2087%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−2363%
197
+2363%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 14−16
−1193%
190−200
+1193%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−2087%
300−350
+2087%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−2350%
196
+2350%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
−764%
120−130
+764%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−1745%
203
+1745%
Fortnite 21−24
−1273%
300−350
+1273%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1568%
300−350
+1568%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−2120%
220−230
+2120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−988%
170−180
+988%
Valorant 50−55
−800%
450−500
+800%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 14−16
−1193%
190−200
+1193%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−2087%
300−350
+2087%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−303%
270−280
+303%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−2050%
172
+2050%
Dota 2 35−40
−1757%
650−700
+1757%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
−764%
120−130
+764%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−1691%
197
+1691%
Fortnite 21−24
−1273%
300−350
+1273%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1568%
300−350
+1568%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−2120%
220−230
+2120%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−1350%
174
+1350%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−2700%
196
+2700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−988%
170−180
+988%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−3483%
430
+3483%
Valorant 50−55
−800%
450−500
+800%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
−1193%
190−200
+1193%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1875%
158
+1875%
Dota 2 35−40
−1757%
650−700
+1757%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
−764%
120−130
+764%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−1609%
188
+1609%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1568%
300−350
+1568%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−988%
170−180
+988%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−1650%
210
+1650%
Valorant 50−55
−800%
450−500
+800%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
−1273%
300−350
+1273%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−3013%
240−250
+3013%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−1679%
500−550
+1679%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−7650%
155
+7650%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−6450%
131
+6450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−447%
170−180
+447%
Valorant 40−45
−1113%
450−500
+1113%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3367%
104
+3367%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−2571%
187
+2571%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−3044%
280−290
+3044%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2550%
159
+2550%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
−2057%
150−160
+2057%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1113%
182
+1113%
Valorant 18−20
−1632%
300−350
+1632%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4900%
50
+4900%
Dota 2 12−14
−1817%
230−240
+1817%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−4000%
80−85
+4000%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3867%
119
+3867%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−4880%
240−250
+4880%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−2300%
95−100
+2300%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
−1875%
75−80
+1875%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Metro Exodus 84
+0%
84
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

This is how GTX 285M SLI and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 273% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 2000% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 2125% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 7650% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER performs better in 55 tests (90%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (10%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.81 76.06
Recency 2 March 2009 8 January 2024
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 285 Watt

GTX 285M SLI has 90% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, on the other hand, has a 1896.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 285M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M SLI
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 285M SLI GeForce GTX 285M SLI
vs
Radeon 540X Radeon 540X
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
vs
RTX 4070 Ti GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GTX 285M SLI GeForce GTX 285M SLI
vs
Radeon 630 Radeon 630
HD 6790 HD 6790
vs
HD 8750M HD 8750M
HD 6790 HD 6790
vs
R5 435 OEM R5 435 OEM
HD 6790 HD 6790
vs
HD 8490 OEM HD 8490 OEM
HD 6790 HD 6790
vs
GTS 240 OEM GTS 240 OEM
GTX 285M SLI GTX 285M SLI
vs
Tesla T10 Processor Tesla T10 Processor
HD 6970M HD 6970M
vs
RX Vega 28 Mobile RX Vega 28 Mobile
HD 6970M HD 6970M
vs
GTX 1070 GDDR5X GTX 1070 GDDR5X
HD 6970M HD 6970M
vs
HD 8400 Mobile IGP HD 8400 Mobile IGP
ATI HD 5770 HD 5770
vs
R5 230 OEM R5 230 OEM
ATI HD 5770 HD 5770
vs
Xavier Xavier

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 4629 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 285M SLI or GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.