GeForce RTX 2080 Super vs GTX 285M SLI

Place in the ranking	687	54
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	32.13
Power efficiency	1.92	14.12
Architecture	G9x (2007−2010)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	N10E-GTX	TU104
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	2 March 2009 (15 years ago)	23 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	3072
Core clock speed	576 MHz	1650 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1815 MHz
Number of transistors	1508 Million	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	348.5
Floating-point processing power	no data	11.15 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	64
TMUs	no data	192
Tensor Cores	no data	384
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1020 MHz	1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	495.9 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	-	1.2.131
CUDA	+	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	60 −133%	140 +133%
1440p	7−8 −1286%	97 +1286%
4K	5−6 −1260%	68 +1260%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	4.99
1440p	no data	7.21
4K	no data	10.28

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

7−8

−1229%

90−95
+1229%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −725%	99 +725%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −3033%	94 +3033%
Battlefield 5	10−11 −1840%	194 +1840%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −1311%	127 +1311%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −1229%	90−95 +1229%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −1467%	141 +1467%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −1317%	170 +1317%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −964%	266 +964%
Hitman 3	10−11 −1030%	113 +1030%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −975%	301 +975%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −1500%	144 +1500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −1009%	122 +1009%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −1138%	198 +1138%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −428%	227 +428%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −1083%	142 +1083%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −2533%	79 +2533%
Battlefield 5	10−11 −1720%	182 +1720%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −1233%	120 +1233%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −1229%	90−95 +1229%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −1144%	112 +1144%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −967%	128 +967%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −932%	258 +932%
Hitman 3	10−11 −1060%	116 +1060%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −911%	283 +911%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −1500%	144 +1500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −809%	100 +809%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −1306%	225 +1306%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −556%	100−110 +556%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −391%	211 +391%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −467%	68 +467%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −2233%	70 +2233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −900%	90 +900%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −1171%	89 +1171%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −778%	79 +778%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −432%	133 +432%
Hitman 3	10−11 −980%	108 +980%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −479%	162 +479%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −1081%	189 +1081%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −581%	109 +581%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −74.4%	75 +74.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

−973%

118
+973%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −1575%	134 +1575%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −1450%	93 +1450%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −1350%	58 +1350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −2067%	65 +2067%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2750%	57 +2750%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1300%	70 +1300%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −4050%	249 +4050%
Hitman 3	9−10 −778%	79 +778%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −1170%	127 +1170%
Metro Exodus	0−1	90
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −2600%	80−85 +2600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −712%	211 +712%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9

−1238%

107
+1238%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −1967%	62 +1967%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −1667%	53 +1667%
Hitman 3	0−1	40−45
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −13000%	131 +13000%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −8800%	89 +8800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1267%	41 +1267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −1700%	36 +1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1850%	39 +1850%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	31
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1900%	40 +1900%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −2600%	81 +2600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −3300%	34 +3300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−1100%

60
+1100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	57 +0%	57 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	141 +0%	141 +0%

4K
High Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

+0%

This is how GTX 285M SLI and RTX 2080 Super compete in popular games:

RTX 2080 Super is 133% faster in 1080p
RTX 2080 Super is 1286% faster in 1440p
RTX 2080 Super is 1260% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2080 Super is 13000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 2080 Super is ahead in 65 tests (94%)
there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.14	50.72
Recency	2 March 2009	23 July 2019
Chip lithography	55 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	250 Watt

GTX 285M SLI has 66.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 2080 Super, on the other hand, has a 1125.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 358.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 285M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 2080 Super is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.